Steve meade designs run in with law
So I’m skeptical of that third meaning, sometimes called macroevolution, where we’re really talking about the mechanism of natural selection and mutation. We do not think that a purely undirected mechanism has produced every appearance of design that we see in nature or in biology. We’re challenging the third meaning of evolution, and that’s where we kind of go to the mat. But that’s not what the theory of intelligent design (ID for short) is mainly challenging. I think the fossil record rather shows that the major groups of organisms originated separately from one another. I’m skeptical about the second meaning of evolution - the idea of universal common descent, that all organisms share a common ancestry. I think small-scale microevolution is certainly a real process. Or it can mean that a purely undirected process - namely natural selection acting on random mutations - has produced all the change that has occurred over time. It can mean change over time, or it can mean that all organisms share a common ancestor such that the history of life looks like the great branching tree that Darwin used to depict the history of life. Well, evolution can have several different meanings. When it comes to evolution, what type of evolution do you agree with and what type do you deny? Biola Magazine sat down with Meyer while he was at Biola and asked him to elaborate on evolution, the scientific merit of the theory of intelligent design and the uncanny similarities between DNA and computer programming. On May 14, Meyer gave a lecture at an event hosted by Biola's Christian apologetics program in Chase Gymnasium, where he made his case that the origin of the information needed to create the first cell must have came from an intelligent designer. He’s also author of Signature in the Cell, a provocative new book that offers the first comprehensive DNA-based argument for intelligent design. A young, Cambridge-educated philosopher of science, Meyer is director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute - intelligent design’s primary intellectual and scientific headquarters. In the growing movement known as intelligent design, Stephen Meyer is an emerging figurehead.